Skip to main content

Why Helen Graham is the Best Brontë Heroine


This month was Anne Brontë’s 200th birthday, so I couldn’t let it go without writing a post in honour of it. 

Anne Bronte, Project Gutenberg

I don't think I'm alone in thinking that Anne was the boldest of her sisters. Her novel The Tenant of Wildfell Hall certainly is the bravest in rebelling against social expectations of women, and Helen Graham is by far my favourite heroine. Here’s why:
1.  She’s an adult, independent woman who has lived a full(er) life in society.
Rather than living in the margins of society, in a state of arrested development, like Jane, Lucy, Agnes or even Cathy who never wanted to leave the moors, Helen’s previous life means she seems more like a well-rounded person. This might have made her story all the more shocking to Victorian audiences, as Helen’s social standing combined with her radical ideas would have been more likely to influence other people than those of a governess. She can’t be dismissed as just a naïve or unreliable narrator. I think this makes her character a very powerful vehicle to express social critiques of expectations and double standards for women and men. And unlike Anne’s other heroine, Agnes Grey, who shows no progression as a character, Helen learns from her experiences.
2. She’s a good mother who is breaking the cycle of toxic masculinity, long before that was a “thing”.
She won’t bring her son up to be ashamed of loving and respecting women, especially his mother. She dismisses false notions of masculinity and the “boys will be boys” attitude, calling out the double standard there is in how people educated and raised boys and girls. Boys were expected to be exposed to the temptations of the world, in the expectation that this would strengthen their character. In contrast, girls were to be shielded and sheltered from anything that might taint their innocence. Helen argues that children are children and should all be protected from harmful influences until they are old enough to be able to differentiate for themselves
3. She has a higher standard for romantic relationships.
She doesn’t think she is obliged to stay with an abusive husband or to take any rubbish from a man. At a time when women were expected to suffer in silence and submit to their spouses, Helen is brave enough to put her self-respect and her desire to protect her child, above any considerations of what society will say. She shuts her bedroom door on him and takes her child away from him – both significant actions in Victorian England where a wife had virtually no rights independently from the wishes of her husband. Cathy and Jane on the other hand, seem to have this almost masochistic desire to be with men who belittle them and show them cruelty. 
Tara Fitzgerald and Toby Stephens as Helen and Gilbert in the BBC production of the Tenant of Wildfell Hall, 1996.

4. She doesn't NEED a husband.
She’s financially independent so doesn’t need a man to support her, and because she’s been married before, she is more savvy about what she does and does not want in a partner; this makes Gilbert Markham raise his game. She therefore has agency in their relationship - WITHOUT needing to compensate for the power dynamic by being having him maimed or killed (See Mr Rochester and Monsieur Paul).
5. She’s the only Brontë heroine who makes a living from her art.
At a time when this was considered unladylike or bohemian, Helen makes money to support herself and her son through her work as a painter. Jane Eyre, Lucy Snow, and even Agnes Grey, although unconventional heroines in many ways, have conventional occupations for ladies of their social situation as governesses, companions and teachers. Emily’s Cathy is not artistic or creative in any way, and Shirley does not need to support herself, having inherited wealth. I feel that Helen’s reliance on her creative talents to provide an income while raising her son, reflects the Brontë sisters’ need to earn extra money without needing to leave Haworth, as they were also carers for the Rev. Patrick Brontë and Branwell. At the same time Helen talks about how much she enjoys her work, and is always looking for an honest critic so that she can improve – which makes me think she’s not just doing it for the money.





Hope you enjoyed this post! Leave a comment and follow The Brown Brontë on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mahmood Mattan, Fortune Man: review

  I remember one time when my daughter, aged 10, came home from school, shocked that some countries still have the death penalty. ‘You mean they actually execute people?’ She asked. ‘Yes,’ I said. ‘But it’s the 21 st century!’ she said. ‘It’s cruel!’ ‘I know,’ I said. ‘We might think it shouldn’t happen, but it does.’ I was reminded of that conversation recently while reading Nadifa Mohamed’s The Fortune Men , alongside listening to Danielle Fahiya’s excellent BBC podcast Mattan: Injustice of a Hanged Man . Both the novel and the podcast tell of the wrongful conviction and hanging of Mahmood Mattan, a Somali Muslim seaman living in Cardiff’s Tiger Bay, in 1952. Mattan was accused of having brutally murdered a local shopkeeper, Lily Volpert (her name is changed in the book to Violet Volacki). Mattan maintained his innocence right to the end, but his appeals were unsuccessful, and he was hanged in Cardiff prison on 3 rd September 1952. His body was interred in the prison grou

St George of Merrie England: History, Myth and Fairy Tale

Today - 23rd April - is St George's Day . Most of us are aware of St George's Mediterranean and Middle Eastern origins; Google says he was born to Greek parents but in fact his mother was from Syria and his father from what is now Anatolia, right in the middle of modern-day Turkey. Not much else is known about him other than that he was a soldier in the Roman army who was martyred for being Christian.  He is also venerated in the traditions of different cultures and faiths, including in some Middle Eastern and Mediterranean countries. The idea of patron saints is an interesting one to me - I've always thought that the fact that these saints hail from different parts of the world to the countries they are patron saints of, is a bit of a paradox. On the one hand their cultural and ethnic differences are overlooked in favour of the unifying aspect of their faith and values - but on the other hand, patron saints are a symbol of nationhood - and often co-opted by nationalists.